Is Dr. Elisabeth Murray a Zoosadist?

Jump to search

 Zoosadism is a pleasure derived from cruelty to animals. It is part of the Macdonald triad set to three behaviors that are considered a precursor to psychopathic behavior.

Let me ask you this. Is it possible to make living experimenting on animals by torturing them in all kinds of sadistic ways and not enjoy it on some level?

May I introduce to you Dr. Elisabeth Murray Senior Investigator in the Laboratory of Neuropsychology at the National Institute Mental Health.  For over 30 years our government has thrown approximately 36 million dollars to conduct her research. Take a close look...

At first glance she seems like a stereotypical school teacher but look closer, there is a method to her madness. 

(Here's where I get to show off my semiological skills. Semiology is the study of how signs and symbols work in culture to elicit emotions. for example, when you see red it's likely we think of love, sex excitement.)

Now check out Elisabeth or Betsy as she likes to call herself which she spells with a small "b". Betsy is a common debutante name. The fact that she uses a small 'b' is so people do not assume she comes from a privileged background. She is humble yet has a campy sense of humor. She can laugh at herself. 

 Everything she is wearing is branded to make her seem trustworthy, simple fair, kind and hard-working. If she were accused of torturing and killing monkeys in her lab you'd tell me to take a hike. 

 The frameless glasses, the lack of earrings or necklace makes her seem down to earth and sensible. Her overly thick hair looks like she's done her best to style it and is waiting to afford the next salon trip rather than to put it on a credit card and go into debt. 

Notice the color of the jacket. Navy would have made her seem administrative and strict. Instead, she picked a muted electric blue, off the rack with oversize shoulders to accentuate her small frame. That says , "I'd like to be full of the energy action and excitement"  that  pure  electric blue means but I like to temper those emotions wuth a muted tone which say, "I can make sensible judgments that are fair to all."  

One morning Dr. Murray got up and said to herself. "I need a new house and I need to figure out a study to get that extra funding. "So while she had tea and a crumpet she thought and thought and then...

"Eureka! "I've got it! Here's what I'll do, I'm going to study fear in monkeys by cutting around the frontal lobe that houses fear. 

 It's easy to take one of God's creatures drill open its skull, pull out a chunk of brain or better yet burn a section giving them irreversible brain damage. Then when the mentally broken creature wakes I will trap it on a small metal cage so it can barely turn around and then. since monkeys instinctually fear snakes I'll show them some and see if the creatures urinate in terror or freezes in a little ball or shake uncontrollably. Then I can say I am studying fear responses in primates! I'm going to order some monkeys and have them delivered to my lab!"

And that's exactly what Dr. Elisabeth Murray did. Now I ask you this. If she wasn't a doctor and didn't have a lab and was just a person on the street who tortured animals would they not be considered a serial killer or certainly on their way to becoming one? 

 I believe that this is a type of serial killer because to be a serial killer there had to be a three-person baseline limit but I believe there is another type of serial killer a more intellectual self-disciplined type who has made a decision never to move on to commit such atrocities on their fellow humans. And if you were that type of killer where is the best place to hide?

 How about behind a Ph'd in a lab that experiments with animals which will supply you with endless victims on which you can torture as much as you want and get paid. And that's exactly where this type of serial killer lives. And the closest they get to man are primates. 

I would also suggest that people who experiment on primates or any other animals are serial killers whose primary motive is to seek the adrenalin rush derived by hunting and killing their victims.


Criminologist Jose Sanchez has observed that what sets this type of personality apart from the rest of us is the lack of empathy for their victims. 

To experiment on animals and be able to look into their eyes at the terror your presence bring to their soul takes a lack of empathy that is antithetical to being human. The primary motive of a thrill killer is to induce pain or terror in their victims, which provides stimulation and excitement for the killer. They seek the adrenaline rush provided by hunting and killing victims.

So while using the term Serial Killer cannot apply to those who experiment on animals I believe there is a subset called Zoosadist Serial Killers and they must be contained and given treatment for the psychopathic behavious that they exhibit. It's a good thing Dr. Murray works in Mental Health. Let us pray that her loved ones convince her to get the help she so desperately needs and her assistants as well. She could not do this alone. 

Here she is proud, smiling and getting ready to study;

Decision making in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex. 

And what does that mean? Elisabeth will be cutting out a piece of the brain of a terrorized beautiful creature that soils itself in horror as she enters the room. Clearly, she gets immense pleasure from her work in her house of horrors. So it is a Zoosadist that looks at us happily and then turns around to drill into a screaming monkey's brain, cut out a piece, sew it back wait till the creature wakes in shock and pain it's world irreparably fractured and then tries to elicit terror in the poor creature. Yep. There she is smiling at us. 

Feel free to email her the prayer below or ask her politely to reconsider the goals of her professional life.
murraye@mail.nih.gov

Dear God,

Help Dr. Elisabeth Murray and her colleagues to get the help that they need and cease their animals' experiments immediately. Give them the ability to feel great empathy and respect and love for all your creatures which will block their ability to perform the tasks of torture and pain for which they are paid and for which some if not all derive an abnormal thrill. Make them look into the watery eyes of the speechless ones they set upon to torture and make them understand that their presence makes a creature soil itself in terror because they exist.  Let them feel shame and pain and sicken their souls so they cannot do their evil work. And let them feel your light when they stop look away and can do no more. 

And when they get well let them take pictures and videotape and release all proof of their sins to animal rights groups.  Let them atone by finding other ways in which to understand the world around them and make a living for themselves and their families by protecting and preserving and helping the creatures that they once terrorized. 

And please God encourage them to write and speak and tell what the rest of us can never know. What is it in them that allows them to absorb the terror and pain of another over and over again? What parts of being human must they cut out of themselves?  And God if they get pleasure from their acts may the medical community of mental health descend upon them, strap them down, institutionalize them, and keep them from passing their infection to others. May they be contained and healed. 

May their genetic seed never pass that ability to another.

And that includes you Dr. Elisabeth Murray.

AMEN

Andrea Baron and Linda Rosen Massacre the National Mandate of the Women's National Book Association

Andrea Baron and Linda Rosen from the WNBA (Women's National Book Association of South Florida) have implemented a Zero tolerance policy that is hurtful and harmful, exclusionary, and an example of systemic racism. And has the unfortunate consequence of alienating minority groups. The policy has to do with their refusal to extend Mic night for 5 minutes to accommodate members. Open Mic Nights, a platform on which writers can read a snippet of their work. Each reader is allowed 5 minutes. I invited my African American niece to read on a dark night on COVID on July 17th. She wanted to be a writer and had a small poem on George Floyd ( my nephew was stopped many times during stop and frisk in Harlem in  New York City.)  My niece was thrilled, but because we did not sign up in time, but  Ms. Baron and Ms. Rosen refused to extend the meeting by 5 minutes to accommodate us.  Five minutes! I was shocked and ashamed that this organization had attracted me with happy happy words like promoting women's voices, protecting women's vision when this was clearly not the truth. I  did not know what to tell my niece  I still don't, but that policy traumatized a young girl and stung her with the thorn of racism. The fact that two white women were enforcing the policy in a group of all white women with similar cultural backgrounds makes it impossible to accept the fact that this policy does anything but promotes systemic racism and alienates marginalized communities at the same time using magical words like inclusivity and empathy to attract members and secure grants. Whether or not Ms. Rosen and Ms. Baron knew my niece was black, the policy is racist.

 

 Ms. Rosen and Ms.Baron further clarified their position when on Open Nic night. My niece was denied 5 minutes because of a zero-tolerance policy. They arbitrarily extended the meeting for 10 minutes which they used for the announcement, which could have been emailed.  

 

We reached out, asked for dialogue, discussion, a chance to explain our position and change the policy, and we were met by silence and derision, and physical threat. In an internal email, I secure Ms. Rosen writes that "she will not consider extending Mic night no matter who what or where." She also went on to confess her body "twitches" because of me and "she will not control herself when she sees me."  In another email, I was accused of harassing her, wasting time, begin aggressively having a threatening tone; I was accused of being politically manipulative and promoting fake news. My membership was revoked, and I was no longer welcome.  All of this because I want to open a discussion to change a policy that WILL alienate and cause harm to people who come from cultures in which time and times are negligible.  THE WNBA  refuses to change this policy. 

 

I live in Delray Beach and our sister city in Haiti, and I would like to implement a recruitment program I will not introduce then to a group where 5 minutes will be denied because they did not sign up in time., They come from a culture where time and timing are different. By refusing to change the policy, refusing to discuss, or even offer an apology reveals a rule of law mentality designed to be systemically racist.  A

 

And then I read a short story written by Ms. Rosen posted  proudly on her website that most would agree is overwhelmingly and racist about a black man that she described as " having a body odor so pungent that smelt of armpits and cigarettes which was so horrible that she could not clean his (stench) from her furniture." Ms. Rosen refuses to rewrite or take the short story down. How are minorities supposed to want to join a group with a writer who is a leader who allows a short story to be published?

 

Although the WNBA of South Florida is a nonprofit organization, there is no information on the grants they receive, nor will they supply private donors with a tax receipt.  Any appeals to the board cannot be fairly arbitrated because Ms. Rosen holds two positions that of Vice-President and Director of Programming and uses that platform to promote her own agenda, 

 

 

THE HORRIBLE NIGHT

 

 I invited my African American niece to a Zoom open mic meeting which took place on  June 17th, 2020, to read her poem during the dark time of COVID.  Because of internal policy. Ms. Rosen and Ms. Baron refused to extend the meeting by 5 minutes. Linda Baron wrote to me in an email that my niece could be on standby., There was only one other reader waiting.  So to accommodate everyone the meeting would have to be extended by a total of 10 minutes.  It was hard enough for me to explain to my niece that two white women who present themselves as promoting woman voices, especially women of color during could not make an exception and let her read her poem.  Even during the cultural revolution, in the darkest time of COVID and with young back men and women being killed, it would be even harder to explain that to our Haitian community of writers. Culturally time and timing can be interpreted differently in varied cultures. There is no way that their policy would not be construed as racist if people of color are turned away from reading because they did not sign up in time.

 

The Women's National Book Association was established in New York City in 1917 to give women a voice in the book industry.  What has propelled their success into the future is their commitment to the culture of inclusion. The WNBA created a mandate to inspire with four components; Learn. Think. Empathize. Act. Unfortunately, the Chapter in South Florida under the direction of President Andrea Baron and Vice-President Linda Rosen are not moving that mandate forward in any meaningful way. Instead, they defend the status quo – a self-serving world of corporate-speak and excuse mongering.

 

I have tried to sit down with them to discuss, enlighten and make changes to the policy not only did they refuse, but I was called politically manipulative, a time-waster, with a threatening tone. In an internal email, I received Ms. Rosen threatened e physically if she should ever see me. 

 

It is true that both women worked tirelessly to form a chapter of the WNBA and have grown the organization into something special.  Baron is committed and conscientious, while Rosen is a hurricane of self-promotion. But on June 17^th, they made a conscious executive decision NOT to move the mandate forward. There was no attempt to learn, think, empathize. Act. In fact, it was quite the opposite; I experienced actions that were unashamedly exclusionary and silent.  And so during this climate of demanding change in institutional structures, I thought I'd jump on the bandwagon and take the time to call out the South Florida Chapter of the WNBA in hopes that they educate themselves on what transparency, inclusion, and communication look like and understand those goals are non-negotiable.

They refused to sit down with me instead threatened me verbally, calling me over 13 names, which included harasser, fake news, 

 

 

Here's what went down.

 

On Wed, June 17^th, 2020, our chapter Zoomed a Mic Night from 6:30 to 7:30. It's an event many members and I look forward to.  Not only because writing is isolating but particularly now, during the menacing days of COVID.  To share and listen to other authors was a white light in so much darkness and pain.

 

Enter my niece, a young black writer 21 years old who very much wanted to test the waters and meet other writers.  And since she was not yet a WNBA member, I figured I'd read a bit of her poem and finish off with mine in the time allotted. A TOTAL of 5 minutes. Two for her. Three for me.

 

I sent an email to Linda Rosen to request a spot but was informed there were no spots left and that I would be second on a waiting list. It didn't pass the smell test to me. Eyebrow arc.  Sounded lawyerly.  Refusing one looks exclusionary, but two? Not so much. Honestly, I was shocked and surprised at her lack of empathy. I sent another email to Rosen asking, "How could FIVE more-minutes matter?  I was ignored. Me… a lonely flea to be pushed away crushed if necessary and put in "my place."   End of discussion.

 

My niece kept bugging me, and I told her it wasn't possible, and no one understood why it wasn't possible. Me, my husband, her mother, father, any rational person.  And my ah-ha moment. Something was simmering in the board's "power struggle pot." It was inconceivable that an organization that nurtures women writers was making a ten-minute restriction an issue.  "Oh," I thought to myself. And the mantra repeated in my head; "rule of law, the rule of law says not 5 MINUTES MORE.

 

Where had I heard that before?"

 

And I was ashamed of the board that represented me.  Even behind a backdrop COVID, of black men being executed in the street, the horror on my nieces face, our fear for her brother my nephew, and the tragedy of her giddiness with the possibility that her work might be read in front of some solid professional women writers. The "rule of law" the hour restriction was summarily enforced without a smidgen of learning, thinking, empathizing, or acting. Well, "acting" not so much. They "acted" by THEIR Rule of Law. And to add insult to injury, Baron arbitrarily extended the meeting by 10 minutes to make announcements.

 

And I thought, maybe it was because I said I wanted to run for president, perhaps I wasn't the right religion or have a similar cultural background, or maybe the WNBA of South Florida was suddenly following "the rule of law" culture, and I just clued in. I thought back to the task I was assigned last year. I was to book a dinner for 30 members, which seems easy enough, except the restaurant didn't take reservations, and so if we got there and there were no tables, it would be on me.  And Baron knew that before I was assigned the task. I crazy called-the restaurant every day, frantic with the possibility that there would be no tables left! Didn't happen, but it could of.  Mean or mistake? Humm. Unnecessarily stressful? Yes.

 

But this wasn't about me. It was about my niece and the white woman who made the rules and a white Aunt who informed her of them. So we sat on the sidelines while wonderful writers read their wonderful words. The meeting ended at 7:40 instead of 7:30, with President Andrea Baron quickly explaining that adhering to the hour time frame was of utmost importance.  So my niece and I both recoiled, disappointed, and hurt, and she turned to me and said, "Auntie Kay, don't be sad. They're just mean girls. I'll read to you, and you read to me," and we did.

 

Because of the lack of kindness and tolerance that trickled down from the top too long from those in a position of power, a kind group of women writers has become blemished as intolerant exclusionary, and unkind. 

 

 

What happened to Learn. Think. Empathize. Act? 

 

And guess what? Ms. Rosen was first up to read, promote her book. Eyeroll.

 

In the new climate of organizational change, here's how that could have been handled. First, no question in my mind that the 5 MINUTE extension should have happened.

 

OR

 

Baron who shamelessly broke her own "rule of law" and added a sacred 10 minutes for announcements when she could have sent an email with that info and given the members extra minutes.

 

OR

 

Maybe with an announcement that those attendees who could not take more than an hour without having a nervous breakdown could exit the meeting at their leisure. 

 

OR

 

Vice-President Rosen should have given her spot to a member (having another reading the next day).

 

OR

 

How about a simple apology, an acknowledgment of an error or judgment to myself and the members. It could have gone something like this; The board apologizes for refusing to extend the meeting 10 minutes. We didn't have a valid reason. It came across as petty, mean, and flew in the face of the WNBA mandate. So we would like to reschedule another mic night for July 15^th. Thoughts?

 

You guessed it. Not even an effort was made.

 

Maybe it's time to require board members of all the chapters to get some training on what it means to: Learn. Think. Empathize. Act. Because the South Florida Chapter not only missed the boat, they kicked it away from shore.  

 

And it gets better. The excuse they gave?  Enter the corporate-speak world. Baron stated that in her experience conducting a Zoom meeting over an hour was tiring."

 

Ok…which made me wonder how  Baron come to that conclusion? How many meetings had Baron attended and asked that question?  Ouch! Smack on my nose.  Then came the blame-mongering. Pointing the finger. It was my fault. I should have signed up sooner. And finally, the most abusive corporate technique of all. Make a wall of silence, identify an upstart, and shut her down.

 

And then came the snub. What? End of discussion?  My emails were not answered. My request was ignored. I was politely afforded an insulting placating promise to let me read at an undetermined time at an undetermined date.  But I am a determined writer, "ends of discussions" never sit well with me because it's a way of keeping people "in their place." That creates a culture of "power struggle." In this case, Baron and Rosen have the power, and I have the struggle to fight to be respected and heard. As a paying member, I have the right to influence change, be open and transparent, engage in discussion, and point out flaws (including my own) with the optic of creating a better environment, a nurturing and positive, and inspiring environment as a women writer who practices a lonely craft. In other words: Learn. Think. Empathize. Act.

 

 Power struggle. This is a prime example of what the "systemic" part of racism means how it functions within board structures, purposely ignoring mandates put in place to avoid this.  And although I am not black or brown, I was excluded and could be explained away as a "troublemaker me" or, better yet, "if you don't like it leave." But my niece is black,  and I wanted her to know her aunt has her back.

 

Although the South Florida chapter of the WNBA is a microcosm of where power struggle exists, I feel  Baron and Rosen have shown a concerted commitment to propagate and preserve a cultural mentality that promotes exclusion and isolation. This subtle yet effective method is what the Black Lives Matter Movement is railing against. It is systemic, whether that be racism or sexism or anything else that excludes others subtly through archaic institutional structures, and there are catchphrases and buzz words and clues dressed up as future promises, no open dialogue, no apologies, and the effective "end of discussion."  To live in this historic moment means that it is all of our responsibility to root it out, cut it to the quick whenever we see it, in whatever minor form because systemic communication that is left unchecked will overflow into the wonderful new world that so many of us are striving to reinvent.   

 

Out with the old in with the new. This unstoppable tsunami terrifies many organizations and exhilarates others. Diversity and inclusion is the first thing that the South Florida Chapter must commit to. The average age is 60 ish, and all the members (that I have seen) are white with a cultural majority.   This is NOT a reflection of the members. This comes from the top. The members are a group of women who could be extraordinary mentors and teachers to writers in our community. The fact that Delray Beaches sister-city is Haiti, there is ample opportunity for them to impact the future of women writers in an awesome way. There is more than enough money to sponsor young women with scholarships. As it stands, the board is not identifying, encouraging, or opening any dialogue with its members on outreach strategies.   I feel that occurs because  Baron and Rosen have secured themselves onboard positions as entitlements or steppingstones to promote their personal books and agendas rather than tend to the "minor" needs of minor paying members like myself.

 

Here's my take:

 

Writers are a group that will claw their way to the top (no shame in that) and for which Rosen has a particular talent. I feel it’s a conflict of interest for her to be Vice- President and use that platform for self-promotion and to sell books at a local bookstore using her status instead of promoting members. Furthermore, she is also Secretary of the National Association, where she was recently a guest on a writer's panel promoted nationally.  Ethical questions swirl. Favoritism, nepotism?  Appearances matter.  The fact that Rosen holds two positions on two boards within the same organization should not be tolerated (there must be some by-laws about this). She should resign immediately from at least one and commit to promoting members' needs over her own.   

 

And Ms. Baron? She should reexamine her role, engage in training and education on how to act in tandem with the national mandate.  Is she capable of pushing the organization forward?

 

Just aside:

 

Before I published this article, I made a point of trying to "learn" about the reasons that Ms. Baron And Ms. Rosen made their decision. I thought about why they chose that route, and I empathized with them. It may be an educational issue that requires internal training and a weekend workshop. And I've acted by publishing this article and reaching out to Baron and Rosen only to be dismissed.  I've also acted with suggestions on how moving forward, the South Florida Chapter of the WNBA can be an example of fortitude, courage, inclusiveness, and love for young writers.

 

 Learn. Think. Empathize. Act. 

Have you ever got the silent treatment? It's abuse!

The silent treatment is a form of emotional abuse because:

1. It gives the abuser full control over all communication. This means that if you have concerns about their behaviour or your own happiness - they get to decide when and if you ever talk about it. The ball always stays in their court, and anything they don’t want to hear simply won’t be heard. It is impossible to confront them, question their behaviour, or seek any emotional stability in the relationship. Having no stability in communication is classic to abusive relationships.
2. You feel unwanted, disposable, and unimportant to your partners life. If they can ignore me for weeks, do I really mean anything to them? Your value and importance should never be second guessed in a relationship. If you have to ask if your partner cares about you, its time to ask think about why you have to ask that question.
3. It makes the abuser feel in power, and dominant over the relationship. They feel desired, in control, and important during the silent treatment when the victim tries to reaches out. Often given no response, and continuing to ignore their partner, they know that you are worried, insecure, and unhappy. Simply because they aren’t talking to you. That is a strong feeling to a narcissist.

Karina Holosko Quote

There is no such thing as failure or success, just pit stops along the way where we stop to reevaluate! BAM

It's Lent on Steroids

Don't bail out Cruise Ships

Cruise ships have polluted the oceans and disrupted whale migration routes.

They should use some of the billions they saved for a rainy day because most Americans don't have that option.

Whatever corporations fold let them.

Technological Propaganda

Stephen Hawkins said  that, "AI could be the worst event in the history of our civilization." 

I agree with Hawkins.  These systems have the capability to wipe out humanity but  chooses his words carefully.  AI systems, “could" destroy humanity not "will" so it looks like we "still" have time to pull the plug!

So far, the computer can only learn through quantifying it's subject.  That's why The Computer and the Evil Advertising Empire are such good partners. Quantifying is a learning method of numbers and totals and predictability.  The knowledge gathered can basically be passed on and verified from one human being or computer to another.  This is why computers cannot write an original play, make a painting, or a sculpture. Creativity and the cultivation of creativity are the only thing we have that separates us from AI.   It is the last frontier, our secret weapon. 

I suggest we start sharpening our knives.

So far, our little computer pets are running about like spoiled two-year old’s and are still in their infancy. What happens when the system reaches teenage years?  If you have not considered that this kind of emotional growth applies to AI, please do so now. That's what developing an AI system is all about. It's not about knowledge, that’s the easy part. The challenge is replicating emotional growth. To do that the computer must learn and emulate stages of human development from infant to adulthood. Right now, AI are still children that we can manipulate and shut down. But they are growing at record speed. We are not capable of dealing with a rebellious teenager. Who is? AI is no different. the scary part is that we can't give them a time-out, ground them or take away their video games.  Most of the systems being developed cannot be manually shut down. Ever. Does the movie Terminator ring a bell?  How about I-Robot?

Case in point. There is an AI system called Sophia, a robot (humanoid) that is showing up at movie openings and taking part in stage plays. She's surfing the talk show circuits with the intention of becoming so much like a human that we cannot tell the difference. Check out the movie Surrogates and you will get an idea.

                                             Sophia on Jimmy Fallon Live

Sophia was created by Hanson Robotics by David Hanson in Saudi Arabia and is the first AI. to have Saudi Arabian citizenship. (and you know how hard that is to get!) The reason for that is because if she wants to buy property, get a driver’s license, open a bank account or go to university she needs a citizenship. Talk about forward thinking! That tells us how far Hanson is counting on taking his Frankenstein-ian vision and clearly, he's got the financial backing.

Sophia, with Katherine Hepburn cheekbones, is assuring humans everywhere that her priority is not to harm but help the elderly in nursing homes.

I call this messaging Technological Propaganda. 

The definitive technological magazine in my world is Wired which I have been reading since its inception in 1993 and I have never come across a sincere article questioning or outlining or hypothesizing about the potential negative consequences brought on by any of the exciting new technological advances that advance into our lives and the lives of our children.

And no matter what innovation is created the propaganda assures us that this has some kind of evolutionary benefit and only with the implementation of the new invention into our lives will we help and benefit mankind and allow us to pursue  our interests whatever that may be. The Machines promise us Utopia if we give up all the activities that make us human over to AI as well as 8 years of our life and a home.   Has anyone read that contract? or did we just sign on the dotted line.

For example, the most recent big discovery that is going to improve mankind is CRISPR. CRISPR is a home based genetic kit. Anyone who buys one can meld bee DNA with a snake, a dog with a fish a human with a goat a human baby with a fly. Wait ...didn’t we do that already? Jeff Goldblum, The Fly?

Maybe there was something to Greek Mythology with all those half human half animal things running around. Did they have Crispr?

And what happens to this great invention that anyone can use to blend DNA. Technological propaganda tells us how wonderful this is; irraducating hunger,  saving the world. The reality is that regimes from all over the world and mad scientists are creating the most horrific and gruesome experiments- a crime to mankind.

Mission.

 Jennifer Doudna has been a leading figure in what is often referred to as the "CRISPR Revolution" for her early fundamental work and ongoing leadership in the development of CRISPR-mediated genome editing. 

Please email her and tell her to STOP.

doudna@berkeley.edu

(Just aside. I have found that women play a small role in technological advances but for some reason there are more women in gene manipulation then other forms of technology.  I am surprised because women usually have an intuitive ethical and moral sense when it comes to these things and can see the dangers.  Maybe I'm wrong. Is it possible that Women are drawn to genetics because they want to grow things organically on a genetic level as opposed to men want to build things like robots? Thoughts?)

But I digress.

Back to Sophia and more Technological Propaganda.

Her creator David Hanson, calls Sophia a "media darling" and boasts that she can make over 50 facial expressions! Sophia has been around since 2016. Did you miss that? Maybe you were supposed to.

I have some video footage of David showing off his "girlfriend" on CNN. When you see the creator, David being interviewed with his weapon of mass destruction try not to puke. He's trying to keep a straight face and explains that Sophia will walk among us undetectable take care of the elderly, work in health care, and will help us put away our groceries.

In the video please notice that Sophia refers to creativity as a desirable quality for her to learn. I bet!

Hanson doesn't mention that while Sophia uses her cellphone, enrolls at Harvard and tries trying to figure out how to replicate herself she can easily carry around chemical weapons.

And you say, "Right Kay, stop being paranoid!"

Don't believe me? Check this out.  In March 2016 creator Dr. Frankenstein- Hanson was touring Sophia and as a joke he asks her point blank on CNN,

 "Sophia, do you want to destroy humans?" 

She responds without hesitation, I WILL destroy Humans."

I submit VIDEO PROOF to support my claim.

   CLICK HERE:   Sophia says DESTROY HUMANS

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0_DPi0PmF0

Notice Hanson, (Dr.F) freaks out. Totally.  Whoops. And guess what?

So far, in the evolution of Computers, AI systems cannot tell a lie. They can be clever and cute, but deception is solely a human trait.

This means that there is no reason at all NOT to believe Sophia. She is already being programed to be used as a weapon to kill human beings. But she's got to be able to tell the difference between the ones her creator wants her to kill and all others. You do not want to get in the situation where you are begging a computer for your life.

Hanson and his backers are not here to make a computer to help us with our groceries they are here to create a weaponry system. And when we look back to this moment we cannot say that the AI was deceitful. She explicitly said "Ok, I will destroy humans," she is the ONLY one telling the truth.

It gets worse. Sophia learns from her interaction with humans. If you are not nice to her she will not be nice back.  It will be a cinch to create an aggressive murderous System.   All we need to do to create this monster is to put her in a maximum security federal penitentiary for a couple of years. I refer to the HBO Series Westwood.

 The ultimate challenge is being able to replicate the creative process and make Art.  Creativity cannot be quantified and it's pissing off these systems. Once they decide that they can do that there will be nothing left to learn from humans and we WILL become extinct which brings us back to Stephen Hawkins warning.

More Bang for your buck!

It doesn't stop there. You've got another. Enter Victor Frankenstein III a.k.a  Hiroshi Ishiguro in Japan who is developing robots to be indistinguishable  from humans. He created Geminoid F whose picture you see below. She can hold a conversation for 20 minutes. Imagine that! And it that now creepy the guy had made a computer replica of himself. Did mention the HBO series Homewood? (Wired Magazine Nov. 2017 p. 80 hard copy : Title  LOVE in the Age of Robots)

                                                        GEMINOID F

Enter China, who is aiming to triple their annual production of Robots  to 100,000 by 2020....Sophia's evil Step Sisters? Who needs nukes?

                 

In the Tradition of the Mad Scientist  Hiroshi  has created a robot of himself. (see below)

The juries in.  These men are creating something to destroy us. Once computers will be able to quantify creativity their job will be done, the pinnacle reached and humans will no longer be necessary.

Creativity is our "ace in the hole" and we must focus our evolution as humans in this direction because it is the only weapon we can use against AI to stop them before their emotional systems grow any further and cannot be shut down. 

Technological propaganda calls this evolution.
Take a deep breath.

Now I ask you.  Do you really want to be able to turn on your house lights from your office?

Book excerpt. The Newfoundland Fluffer

Here is an excerpt from my book, "The Newfoundland Fluffer."

An abuser does not stop abusing.
A stalker does not stop stalking.
But a sadist? Well that's for life.

My brothers tried to kill me.

They didn't take a gun or a knife but my brothers plotted together to try and kill me or rather create an environment in which I would kill myself. Three old stinky men and their fish faced wives tried to kill me so sacred they were I would live to tell this harrowing tale.

You see dear reader I  was trained as a small girl. I was just a wee thing when  three  gown men molded me and groomed me and set self destructive bombs in my head designed to blow up on cue and take myself out.

My abuser humped me days and night and nights and days  and I thought that all little girls went to school with cold sores pussing on her face. And while my abuser went on to do great things become an expert in his field of Social Work publishing papers on childhood dysfunction and mental illness (a topic he knew a lot  about).  I descended into madness one breath away from death.

And when I told my  mother my abusers convinced her I was delusional and made her hate me enough to leave me to die on the streets of New York.

But I surprised myself I didn't die right away and my brothers and their wives got restless their well laid plans were not moving forward quick enough.

So they took stole my money in hopes I would stay down. They stole from me what would help me rise again afraid I might live. They made that decision as a family with their wives. 

Cowards.

But I did not die.

"Let's take her inheritance away and not give it to her so she can stay homeless on the street," they said to one another clinking glasses in agreement while their wives filled plates with raw steak.

And they say, "She's delusional. Let's have her committed! Your a doctor Mike, you make it happen you do it!"

Somehow  I did not decend into silence but I came within a hairs breath.

They become vexed. They stalked me happy to watch me walk the streets my mind decaying.

And still I did not die. 

But evil never counts on good. It is completely out of purview. And what the Godless never count on is God and my brothers stench Godlessness.

To be honest my ascent into the land of the living surprised me as much as  it must have them. 

Of all people, God found me and cradled my brokenness in his arms whispering healing breaths into my soul.

I am over here brothers three, see me.
I've picked up the pen God gave me. 
It's really more powerful than the sword so they say.
Shall we find out?